11.19.2007

7 rules for talking about gentrification

I read articles and blogs about gentrification every day thanks to my daily search for Neighbor News articles, and I have come to the conclusion that most people are at a loss for how to have a constructive conversation about gentrification. If people from different walks of life in a neighborhood can agree on what's actually going on in their specific neighborhood, then they have a much better shot on working together towards a common solution. If they can't even talk about what's happening without confusing or infuriating each other, then there's little hope. So I have put together some rules for talking about gentrification:

1. Be as specific as possible.
Gentrification is a complicated process that impacts different neighborhoods and cities in different ways. The demographics of gentrification vary significantly.

The gentrifiers may be White, Asian or, yes, Black people in their 20s and 30s. They may cause the opening of locally-owned boutiques, chain stores, big boxes or farmer's markets. They may be moving into dense areas or former warehouse districts or bungalow areas. It may be the upper middle class moving into a middle class area or artists moving into a low income area, or students into a diverse neighborhood. The people moving in may be from the suburbs, other parts of the city, other parts of the country, or immigrants from around the world. They may bring cars, but they also might prefer bikes and public transportation. They might want a Starbucks, or they might fight harder than anyone else to prevent a Starbucks from opening. They might be mostly single, or mostly young families. They might like hip hop or they might like country.

The folks already living in the neighborhood may be from families that have lived in the area for a few generations, or recent immigrants. They may love the neighborhood or they may be looking for a way out to a better life. There may already be thriving retail, or there may be almost nothing.
The dynamics of an immigrant hub are very different from that of a emptied out former industrial area. Up to 25% of Americans move every year, which means that your neighborhood is constantly changing. There is likely a lot of diversity among people in your neighborhood; in particular, home owners and renters are impacted very differently by gentrification.

Yes, it's true that the groups that are forced to interact in a gentrifying neighborhood are likely different in some way. But don't assume that the differences are universal across the city or country. Being specific about exactly who is interacting in your neighborhood will make it more likely that you will be able to understand and act on the specific challenges facing your neighborhood.

2. Get your history right.
I see a lot of posts and articles in which people blithely declare that certain groups have "historically" dominated the neighborhood. It may be that certain groups have indeed been in the neighborhood for a while, but they were likely preceded by a completely different group, and so forth and so on back to the dinosaurs. And everyone has had beef with each other. The point is, don't fall into the "this neighborhood belongs to that group" trap since it's a) false and b) counterproductive to actually doing something to ensure that people who identify with that group can indeed continue to feel at home in the neighborhood. I've also seen artists occasionally claim that they "made" the neighborhood. This is obviously offensive and overblown rhetoric to be avoided.

3. Look at the push and pull factors.
Believe it or not, some people in your neighborhood want to move for reasons that have nothing to do with gentrification (though population changes can accelerate their move). For example, longer-time residents may be near retirement age and eyeing a comfortable community in a warmer climate, decimating a large portion of the older population in the neighborhood. Younger, newer residents may be feel the pull of the exurbs once they have kids, ensuring a cycle of 20-somethings that never quite seem to grow up. Working class residents may be eyeing a traditional suburban home and car-based lifestyle as proof to themselves and their friends that they've made it. Locally-owned stores may close because of a death in the family, or because the owner wants to retire or because it's never made any money. Being honest about who wants to stay, and how to help them to stay, will make you more successful at truly fostering a diverse community.

4. Be realistic about the extent of the impact.
One coffee shop or one condo building does not gentrification make. Media and bloggers are especially guilty of claiming that relatively small changes in the neighborhood constitute total gentrification. Don't let your frustration with other parts of the city or larger problems, however real and upsetting, like racism or a downturn in the art market make you quick to find problems in your neighborhood. I especially hate the "and now everyone's moving to Jersey City" claims; they rarely jive with the actual demographic patterns. Being realistic about the impact, including who is actually moving into any of the new housing created in the neighborhood, will help you win more support from people who want to work with you.

5. Separate developers from residents.
Individual developers can make calculated decisions to significantly change the demographics of your neighborhood. Residents generally can't. They just want a nice place to live. Do not assume that people moving into new or rehabbed buildings in your neighborhood are taking their marching orders from the developer. They are not part of any conspiracy. If there's any conspiring going on, which is usually simply how to make money, it's being done by the developer or city government, not the residents.

6. Define "affordable housing."
Pretty much everyone likes the idea of affordable housing. Heck, everyone would like to pay less for their home. But without defining what this means, it's hard to understand who it will benefit. Be specific about what income levels affordable housing needs to serve in your neighborhood, and the extent of the demand. Just throwing out the phrase, "we need more affordable housing" is too vague. Many people in the neighborhood simply don't know the extent of the specific problem in your neighborhood, and would appreciate some numbers to get their brain working
on solving the problem.

7. Talk in person.
You won't solve anything by screaming at people on blogs. The best way to do something about gentrification, or at least to understand what's going on in your neighborhood, is to talk to all sorts of your neighbors in person. Invite your neighbors over for dinner or set up an informal discussion at a local church or some other institution, and keep it confined to residents. Institutions and city government change the discussion.


Feel free to suggests additions or edits!

*For an analysis of moving rate trends in the U.S. see this paper. Note that in the original version of this post I inaccurately stated that "50% of Americans move every year." In fact, approximately 50% of city residents moved between 1995 and 2000. Though not as shocking a figure as an annual 50% moving rate, this figure nonetheless suggests that city neighborhoods are likely to have seen a great deal of population turnover within a relatively short time.

21 comments:

Bryce said...

Very sensible!

Kit Hodge said...

Thanks! I hope this works for you. Let us know.

Mary said...

This is really healthy, positive way to break down empty rhetoric that is not really communicating a useful message. Thanks for the insight, from someone who is new to the area and contributing to this process as one of the many profiles of a gentrifying demographic.

Anonymous said...

8. Leave the newcomers alone, unless you are actively favoring housing discrimination (as Mission Anti-Displacement Coalition does).

9. Go away, or at least stay out of my neighborhood.

Anonymous said...

If you apply everything said here, then the entire racist agenda get wiped clean. What else will the disenfranchised hold on to? What will Chris Daly have to complain about besides nothing about his very own district. The absolute best thing that could happen to SF is for a major "gentrification" to happen in the very center of the city - the Tenderloin. Damn shame that it has been allowed to fester unchecked for so long.

Kit Hodge said...

I'm guessing that the anonymous comments on here are designed to show what not to do when talking about gentrification. Thanks for the show guys!

Anonymous said...

Where do you get the absurdly high figure that "50% of Americans move each year"? Common sense says that's too high; the Census Bureau pegs the number at 16%

Anonymous said...

50% seems high, but 16% is probably deceptively low. keep in mind that the Census doesn't record college populations, which tend to move every year for five years straight.

Kit Hodge said...

I'm looking for the paper in which I saw the 50% figure. I believe it was specifically referencing city neighborhoods which have a higher proportion of renters, and thus tend to be more fluid. Until I can find the proper citation, though, I've changed the post to reflect the date in this article: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE7DB113DF933A15751C1A967958260

The statistics do indeed fluctuate a great deal depending on demographics, location and renter/owner. Hopefully I'll find the proper paper soon. I regret the sloppy citation in the original post. Apologies and thanks for questioning me.

JP Paulus said...

i think these rules are great.

#6 is something that the Uptown boards need to do. They define "affordable housing" as simply "Cabrini Green". They don't seem to considerable affordable home OWNERSHIP as part of the solution. Things like the Habitat for Humanity homes in their own neighbrohood, co-ops. etc. ar eother options that if they took the lead on, would gain support from more of the community.

Another rule: Do NOT be anonymous online when talking about it. It goes along with the "talking in person". If you look at the Uptown blogs, the most hateful things come from "Anonymous".


Another rule: Talk about solutions for those being affected. Even a busy all-volunteer group can organize a seminar to qualify for C-PAN and other housing. Groups like the Rogers Park Community Development Corp. can do the main work; you just have to organize it.

Anonymous said...

Fantastic, sensible ground rules. I'll be applying these at our neighborhood meetings here in Logan Square. From what I have experienced, I can't say I am hopeful everyone will embrace these. However, even if a few do, perhaps we will have a more civil, constructive dialogue. Thanks.

Michele said...

Spot on tips ... When my youngest sister bought smart and early at a new condo at 12th & U Street NW - we had to gently inform those nice folks who own Ben's Chili Bowl that our grandfather had graduated from Cardozo ... then Central ... moral of the story ...

Irish Catholics are indeed everywhere.

PCC said...

My favorite #1 rule: "they" are people, too. Kind of like #7, but sometimes you have to be really specific.

My #2 is like yours: the neighborhood has been changing since long before either you or I got here, and will keep changing long after you and I are both long gone. Sometimes, it helps to do some research on the neighborhoods your own ancestors lived in, since chances are that some of those places have changed a lot in the years since.

Anonymous said...

Central was indeed the precursor to Cardozo, when it was an all-white high school at the time that U Street was still an all-black area and there was an invisible line that basically separated the white community of Columbia Heights and the now Adams-Morgan area on the north and west sides of Meridian Hill/Malcolm X Park from the black Shaw-LeDroit Park communities on the east/southeast sides during the first half of the 20th century. How's that for history. Chances are that people who went to "Central" might not have ever even ventured down to U Street where the Ben's Chili Bowl now stands.

Addictive Picasso said...

Point 7 is really important. There's a civic involvement creep going on just now that mutes constructive engagement with issues of gentrification. I've blogged on it at http://tinyurl.com/2hwtm7

Tom Aloisi said...

#8. Don't ever call yourself- or others- a "pioneer." It's disrespectful, and often racist.

Thrip said...

i disagree with #5. Developers work gelatinously to capitalize on exactly what people want. If there wasn't a demand for luxury condos on skid row you'd have to be a fool to build them.

Anonymous said...

This is such bullshit. It reinforces that paternalistic attitude that gentrifiers automatically bring to the table. GREAT GOING! (Who cares youre going to die in Hell, anyway.)

Kit Hodge said...

Hi anonymous. What do you recommend, then? Besides dying in hell.

kinderkyack said...

I would add another: (I live in a neighborhood that recently absorbed two new houses built on an already too-small, but beautiful property that was subdivided; a fight with the developer ensued after unauthorized tree removals and agreements on building size and design were ignored.)
" be aware of and sympathetic to the adverse impact that your new building/house may have had on your new neighbors. They may have lost access to sun and sky or trees; your heat pump or cars may have brought noise at times that had been very quiet. If you have the opportunity, discuss it with your neighbor, let them know you regret their loss. See if you can find small ways to make up for it by being a great neighbor! Helping them clear snow from their walk, sharing some extra muffins you baked, or just being respectful of their requests or listening to their rant could go along way to helping them deal with the loss and seeing positives in the changes.

Kit Hodge said...

That's a good one kinderkyack! Thanks for the idea.